Democracy in India
is fast deteriorating into a 3D variety. It is decaying, demeaning and has
become hopelessly ‘debateless’ in the past sixty years of existence. Indian
constitution is still considered one of the best in the world and it is
undoubtedly a standard template for any newborn democracy or those undergoing
springs (and autumns) in their democratic evolution. Though adapted from the
British, the vision and farsightedness of those who made up our Constituent
Assembly could successfully put together a document that can hold a nation of
million varieties in every aspect of life but one culture and one civilization
together for all times to come. However, the quality of those who were
subsequently getting elected every five years to uphold our constitution
steadily deteriorated and the results are showing.
The quality of
debate that took place in our Constituent Assembly is something without any
comparison. Core features of our constitution are something that has come out
of hardcore debates like ‘amruth’ out of ‘palazhi’. But those who inherited the
constitution have failed to live up to the expectations of our erstwhile
leaders who were outstanding parliamentarians in addition to being politicians.
Succeeding generations of Indian politicians have completely distorted the
meaning of some of the key elements of our constitution viz. Reservations,
Minorities and Secularism. The self-defeating traits of Vote-Bank Politics and
Political Correctness are now dominating the minds of most of the Indian
politicians. To make matters worse, the unprecedented levels of corruption is
taking Indian democracy to its death bed within a century of its birth, unless
there is a new avatar who can save us from the asuric politicians.
Leadership Qualities
Maximum damage to
Indian polity has been inflicted by our politicians, the elected among whom are
the so-called lawmakers. One of the most important marks of a politician in a
democracy must be his or her ability to communicate. They must be able to articulate well in the
parliament and communicate with the masses through electronic and print media,
in addition to talking part in the rallies and seminars. But see the case of
India now. We have atleast four of our top-most political authorities who do
not talk at all and never participates in the parliamentary debates for making
laws that govern our nation. No one knows what is in their mind and what type
of human beings are they? India’s common men do not know what are the opinions
of their rulers? And what are their proposals for solving the problems?
Another important
requirement is the need of transparency in public life. Democratically elected
leaders must not only be honest but must also appear so. If anyone raises any
question on his or her integrity, the response must be immediate and without
any delay or excuse. Unlike earlier days it may not be a practical option to
step down every time there is an allegation, but the written or spoken denial
or explanation is a must. Otherwise they must resign immediately and face the
enquiry. The recent trend in India
is to keep quiet and never ever respond to any allegations or questions. Security
is provided to the rulers for their safety and not for isolating them from the
very public who have elected them. Hiding under the security curtain,
unanswerable to the nation seems to the easiest way to avoid inconvenient
questions. Rulers of India are now clearly above the rule of India law.
Corruption Galore
If only a miniscule
proportion of Indian politicians were corrupt till 1970s, the percentage is
almost 75% in contemporary India .
Popular perception about the top echelons of power in India has reached an all
time low and many politicians now genuinely believe that they cannot survive in
Indian politics unless they are ‘smart’ in corruption. Air of confidence
radiated by Raja and Kalmadi when they were under arrest for corruption has established
such a notion in the minds of almost all our politicians. The notion is bound
to get more established when the two will eventually walk free and are awarded
millions of rupees as compensation for defamation. All political parties are
facing the same situation and when it comes to corruption the nation finds that
there is no party with a difference. With atleast a few skeletons in the
cupboard, no political party is able to stand up and clean up the system now.
The recent
anti-corruption wave in India is nothing but a natural reaction of a few well
meaning members of the civil society from the pre-independence era against the
all enveloping corruption clouds that will eventually destroy our nation.
Silence is the best encouragement for corruption and that is exactly what our
rulers are encouraging us to do by their own silence. Media can do quite a lot
in saving the nation now. In the all pervading electronic era, we are
surprisingly having lesser numbers of investigative journalists who can easily
unearth the Swiss accounts and corrupt deals. The Bofors enthusiasm is
completely missing among the present generation of Indian journalists. Just one
Chitra Subramanian or Arun S hourie
can still bring down the complete corrupt edifice that is haunting India today.
The next general
elections in 2014 will present the best bet for a change in political climate
of our nation. All participants must be made to talk and American style debates
must be made mandatory. Those in power will not take any initiative in this,
but our electronic media can definitely force the situation. The potential PMs
must come to a single platform and debate. The advantage of any open debate is the
recording of commitments made by the contesting parties. It will also reveal
the individual as well as his or her capabilities to understand and handle the
situations. Those without any merit but only some connections and family name
will stand completely exposed in an open debate. Political ‘dumpheads’ must be
kept away and only those who are elected to the Lok Sabha must become the Prime
Minister of India. That is the best immediate anti-dote for rampant corruption
that we can hope for.